Scala is multi-paradigm, but it really stresses the functional aspects. It is very much functional-first. So your list is definitely majority functional in a language landscape where most languages aren’t functional. Hence I stand by my comment.

Yes, lots of languages are multi-paradigm and most have included some functional aspects in recent years, mainly in the form of lambdas and higher-order methods. However, almost all lack the other key aspect of functional programming, immutability. I’m not a Smalltalk expert, does the Smalltalk standard library provide immutable collections that are at the same level as mutable collections? Most of the languages you there that have added lambdas and include a reasonable number of higher-order functions/methods only come with highly mutable collections. That is what makes them very much non-functional.